NEW BORN USE FOR ILLEGAL GAINS BY HIS OWN MOTHER

THE HABITUAL RESIDENCE OF SEBASTIAN BECAME MEXICO.

DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN LEFT TO MEXICO ON MAY 25, SAMANTHA NO LONGER LIVED WITH DANIEL, THE MOTHER SAMANTHA WAS TO ARRIVE MAY 28, 2007. THERE WERE NO CUSTODY AGREEMENTS, NO COURT ORDERS AND NOT EVEN ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS, THERE WERE NO WARRANTS.

THE POLICE REPORT MAKES VERY SPECIFIC STATEMENT THERE WAS NO ABDUCTION AND THEY KNEW DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN WERE IN MEXICO ALREADY.

THIS EXHIBIT TO JOHN LOWRY EXPLAINS ALL THAT WAS HAPPENING AS OF MAY 30.

AFTER SAMANTH KEPT POSTPONING HER TRIP, AND DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN NEEDED TO RETURN TO AUSTIN FOR THE CLOSING OF THE PROPERTY IN LOCKHART AND PICK DANIEL CAR LEFT IN LAREDO PARKING LOT, DANIEL SENT THIS EMAIL TO SAMANTHA ON JUNE 2, WHICH ALSO SHOWS THE THREATS AND VIOLENCE OF THE LOWRY FAMILY AGAINST DANIEL PARENTS (above 6o years old, the father nearly 80) AND DANIEL SAYING HE WAS GOING TO LAREDO AND FOR SAMANTHA TO SEND ANYONE WITH THEIR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS TO THE BORDER FOR DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES AND TO STOP SUCH VIOLENCE BY THE HEART CONDITION OF THE MOTHER OF DANIEL

SAMANTHA HAD STOLEN THE TRAVEL DOCUMENTS OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN AND REFUSED TO SEND THEM TO DANIEL, FURTHERMORE, DANIEL WENT WITH SEBASTIAN TO THE BORDER OF LAREDO ON JUNE 3 2007, BUT SAMANTHA REFUSE TO SEND ANYONE WITH THEIR TRAVEL DOCUMENTS TO THE BORDER FOR SEBASTIAN AND DANIEL TO BE ABLE TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES.

SAMANTHA EVEN OBTAINED RESTRICTIONS FROM THE COURT IN AUSTIN IN SECRET PROCEEDINGS THAT STARTED ON MAY 30 AND KEPT PURPOSELY SECRET FROM DANIEL WITHOUT SERVICE OR ANY TYPE OF NOTICE, TO PLACE RESTRICTIONS AGAINST DANIEL TO OBTAIN TRAVEL DOCUMENTS FOR SEBASTIAN, AND CLAIMING BY FRAUD AND DECEPTION SEBASTIAN WAS IN AUSTIN. JUST FOR THE PURPOSE TO MAKE IMPOSSIBLE THE RETURN OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN TO AUSTIN.

BUT SUCH FALSE INITIAL PLEADINGS OF MAY 30 CAN BE PROVEN WITH THE HABEAS CORPUS , WHERE THEY CLAIM SEBASTIAN IS IN MEXICO AND IS BEEN SECRETING THE CHILD, WHEN IN FACT DANIEL WAS WAITING FOR SAMANTHA IN MEXICO AND EVEN GIVED HER $2000 FOR HER TRIP.

SAMANTHA BROKE INTO DANIEL HOMESTEAD, DANIEL FILED TRESPASSING CHARGES BUT SAMANTHA HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH WESTBROOK WHO REMOVED SUCH CHARGES AND ANY CHARGE DANIEL MADE WITH THE POLICE, JOE D MILNER THEN BY FRAUD AND DECEPTION FILE AND ORDER IN COURT IN JUNE 13 TO GRANT THE HOMESTEAD TO SAMANTHA AND RESTRAINING ORDERS AGAINST DANIEL OR ANYONE IN HIS BEHALF, THAT WAY THEY SEIZED ALL DOCUMENTS OF DANIEL AND LATER USED FOR FRAUD. SAMANTHA ET AL WITHHELD HIS TAXES, WITHELD THE LOANS AND DEEDS THAT SHOWED THE PAINTINGS, HIS HOMESTEAD, AND 20 ACRES WERE DEEDED TO DANIEL FATHER RAUL, THEN ALTERED DOCUMENTS, RECORDS AND THE THEFT STARTED.

THE WORDING WAS PURPOSELY DONE TO MAKE THE FALSE WARRANTS AND CLAIMING DANIEL LEFT AFTER THE ORDER WAS ISSUED, REASON WHY THEY DID NOT SERVED SUCH COURT DOCUMENTS, UNTIL THEY WILL OBTAIN THE FALSE WARRANTS.
THEN BY SAMANTHA ET AL MAKING IMPOSSIBLE THE RETURN OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN TO THEIR HOME IN AUSTIN, SAMANTHA ET AL USING THE MEDIA FOR THEIR LIES, AND HIGH INFLUENCE FOR THEIR INTERNATIONAL HARRASMENT.

THAT WAY, THEY HAD THE FAKE GROUNDS FOR THE FRIVOLOUS SUITS. BUT TO MAKE THE MILLIONS BY FRAUD, THEY NEEDED TO KEEP SEBASTIAN ALLEGLY KIDNAPPED, REASON WHY SAMANTHA REFUSE TO ANY AGREEMENT, REFUSE TO SEND THE TRAVEL DOCUMENTS OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN, DID NOT SEND ANYONE TO LAREDO TO LET DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN INTO THE UNITED STATES, AND SENT JOSEPH LOWRY WHO HAD APPARENTLY BEEN ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ABUSE TO A CHILD IN THE PAST(IN THE INTERNET SAID HE RAPED A 5 YEAR OLD CHILD). REASON WHY THEY PICK HIM TO PICK SEBASTIAN, BUT EVEN DANIEL ATTEMPTED TO DELIVER SEBASTIAN IN THE BRITISH EMBASSY, BUT SEE WHAT HAPPENED.

WITH PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AND THREATS AGAINST DANIEL PARENTS KNOWING DANIEL HAD LEFT TO VERACRUZ, AND KNOWING OF THE HEART CONDITION OF THE MOTHER, BUT ALSO AGAINST DANIEL PARTNER IN AUSTIN. THAT WAY DANIEL WILL HAVE NO HELP.
THE HARRASMENT OF SAMANTHA LOWRY ET AL WAS EVEN AGAINST THE BROTHER DAVID IN FRANCE AND THE SISTER OF DANIEL IN ENGLAND, BUT MAINLY AS DISTRACTION WHILE THEY KEPT THE SUITS SECRET.

SAMANTHA IN FACT USE HER NEW BORN SON FOR PROFITS. WHICH IN FACT WITH THE EXHIBIT USED IN COURT AND EMAILS OF THAT DATE PROVES THE TRUE FACTS AND THE SEVERAL AGGRAVATED PERJURIES AND PERJURIES OF SAMANTHA.

THE PURPOSE WAS TO STEAL ALL THE PROPERTY OF THE PAVON CUELLAR FAMILY, EVEN OF THE PARENTS OF DANIEL. THE AUGUST 13 NON SERVICE AND THE AUGUST 22 PERJURY ON SERVICE (35 MILLION DOLLARS FRAUD)
YES, THEY USE THE LAW TO OBTAIN MILLIONS BY THEFT, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS, WITH FALSE WARRANTS, AND WITHOUT NOTICE OR LEGAL SERVICE.

IMMEDIATELY THEY EMPTIED THE BANK ACCOUNTS OF THE PARENTS OF DANIEL, AND STARTED TO AUCTION THEIR LAND

THERE WAS NO ABDUCTION AND NO WRONGFUL REMOVAL OF SEBASTIAN BY DANIEL FROM AUSTIN TO MEXICO.

BY THE ACTIONS OF SAMANTHA TO MAKE IMPOSSIBLE THE RETURN OF SEBASTIAN AND DANIEL TO THEIR HOME IN AUSTIN, DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN HAD NO POSSIBLE WAY TO RETURN TO TEXAS, AND WERE FORCED TO REMAIN IN MEXICO BY SAMANTHA ACTIONS TO PREVENT THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF DANIEL TO HAVE DUE PROCESS AND IN VIOLATION OF THEIR FREEDOM AND PRIVILEGES OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN.

BY THE ABANDONMENT OF SAMANTHA, BY HER ACTIONS AND FRAUDULENT BEHAVIOR, MEXICO BECAME THE HABITUAL RESIDENCE OF SEBASTIAN. THERE WAS NO WRONGFUL REMOVAL BY DANIEL AND EVEN THE POLICE MAKES THE STATEMENT, AND THE ORDERS CAME AFTER DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN WERE IN MEXICO, BUT SAMANTHA ET AL MADE IMPOSSIBLE THEIR RETURN TO THEIR HOME TO MAKE FALSE CLAIMS, FRIVOLOUS SECRET SUITS TO STEAL EVERYTHING FROM THE PAVON CUELLAR FAMILY USING THE NEWBORN BABY.

THIS FRAUD WAS PLANNED SINCE AT LEAST 2006 BY THE LOWRY FAMILY ET AL

THIS WAS A VIOLATION TO DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN FREEDOM RIGHTS, BUT ALSO RESULTING IN THE VIOLATIONS OF NEARLY ALL THEIR RIGHTS. THE HARM OF THE ACTIONS OF SAMANTHA ET AL HARM SEBASTIAN AND DESTROY THE PAVON CUELLAR FOREVER, JUST FOR A BIG THEFT.

SEBASTIAN LIVED IN MEXICO FOR 7 MONTHS, THE TIME THAT TOOK FOR SAMANTHA TO AGREE TO AN AGREEMENT AND SUCH ALSO AGREED BY ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS, AND AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS BY DANIEL OF MAKING AGREEMENTS AND MEDIATIONS DURING THE 7 MONTHS PRIOR.

SEBASTIAN WAS WRONGFULLY REMOVED FROM MEXICO IN BREACH OF THE CONTRACT AND CUSTODY AGREEMENT
SUCH CONTRACT IS FULLY VALID UP TO DATE IN MEXICO UNDER ARTICULO 1793 OF THE CIVIL CODE IN MEXICO AND UNDER RULE 11 AGREEMENT IN TEXAS

WE HEREBY SEEK IMMEDIATE RELIEF UNDER ART 1 B) AND ART 3) OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION AND THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES HEREBY BELOW BUT NOT LIMITED TO;
Article 1
The objects of the present Convention are -
a) to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in any Contracting State; and
b) to ensure that rights of custody and of access under the law of one Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States.
The Convention shall apply to any child who was habitually resident in a Contracting State immediately before any breach of custody or access rights. The Convention shall cease to apply when the child attains the age of 16 years.

SAMANTHA BREACH THE CONTRACT WHICH IS A JOINT CUSTODY AGREEMENT WERE DANIEL WILL HAVE SEBASTIAN IN HIS POSSESSION AND ON HIS OWN; DAILY FOR 4 HOURS, SAMANTHA THE REMAINING TIME. Samantha abducted the child and wrongfully refuses to return the child to Mexico

SINCE NEVER EXISTED ANY WRONGFUL REMOVAL OF DANIEL TO SEBASTIAN FROM TEXAS, THERE WERE NO ORDERS OR AGREEMENTS, NOT EVEN PROCEEDINGS, SAMANTHA WAS TO ARRIVE TO MEXICO MAY 28, BUT DID NOT, INSTEAD SHE ENGAGED IN THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES MENTIONED ABOVE TO MAKE IMPOSSIBLE THE RETURN OF DANIEL AND SEBASTIAN TO THE UNITED STATES AND MAKE IMPOSSIBLE DUE PROCESS, ONLY THAT WAY THEY OBTAINED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BY FRAUD AND DECEPTION WHICH THEY WERE NOT ENTITLED TO. JUST FRIVOLOUS SUITS AND FALSE CLAIMS

Article 7
Central Authorities shall co-operate with each other and promote co-operation amongst the competent authorities in their respective State to secure the prompt return of children and to achieve the other objects of this Convention.
In particular, either directly or through any intermediary, they shall take all appropriate measures -
a) to discover the whereabouts of a child who has been wrongfully removed or retained;
b) to prevent further harm to the child or prejudice to interested parties by taking or causing to be taken provisional measures;
c) to secure the voluntary return of the child or to bring about an amicable resolution of the issues;
d) to exchange, where desirable, information relating to the social background of the child;
e) to provide information of a general character as to the law of their State in connection with the application of the Convention;
f) to initiate or facilitate the institution of judicial or administrative proceedings with a view to obtaining the return of the child and, in a proper case, to make arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access;
g) where the circumstances so require, to provide or facilitate the provision of legal aid and advice, including the participation of legal counsel and advisers;
h) to provide such administrative arrangements as may be necessary and appropriate to secure the safe return of the child;
i) to keep each other informed with respect to the operation of this Convention and, as far as possible, to eliminate any obstacles to its application.
Article 10
The Central Authority of the State where the child is shall take or cause to be taken all appropriate measures in order to obtain the voluntary return of the child.