CAFCASS HARM TO CHILDREN FUTURE

EXHIBIT ”N”
Questions to Cafcass:
1)      Did Cafcass attempted contact with Daniel, the father of Sebastian?
2)      Did Cafcass attempted contact with any of the members of the Pavon Cuellar Family?
3)      Did Cafcass attempted any email communication with the father?
4)      Why not?
5)      Do you believe the parents have equal rights, regardless of sex, race or origin?
6)      Do you believe that the people who care most for the baby is his natural parents?
7)      Do you believe you can make a wise decision hearing only one side of the story?
8)      Do you believe is in the best interest of Sebastian, and even decide his whole future and the generations he will bring, by just have heard one side of the story?
9)      Do you believe your actions look honestly for the true best interest of Sebastian?
10)   You view the sites Daniel the father published, so you know, Samantha was physically violent, you know and seen the evidence of her fraud, the theft, the negligence to my son, how she placed my son at risk of dead, how she abandon him, how she refuse to give medical attention and the harm that caused, the records of Samantha refusing to vaccines, stolen records, perjuries, you know about all she did to my elderly parents, to the grandparents of Sebastian, you know of their physical violence and family violence of Samantha and her family, you see affidavits and witness statements, and you had access to all these records and evidence been public since October 2008, yet you make a report that places my son in serious danger and a permanent harm for life. The court counts on your expertise to make balance, fairness, with equality; The Cafcass website claims all of the following statements and several others that prove they did not follow their duties. The Failed looking the best interest of the child, they placed in serious danger the future of Sebastian, and they violated his rights and the father’s rights, but also of each member of the Pavon Cuellar; read the duties they did not follow:

The Children’s Guardian
Helping to achieve the best
Possible outcome for children
Who need safeguarding?
Putting children first
In family courts

What is CAFCASS?

The job of the Children and Family
Court Advisory and Support Service -
CAFCASS - is to safeguard1 and
Promote the welfare of children involved
In family court proceedings.
The Children Act 2004 places a statutory duty on bodies and agencies
working with children to make arrangements to safeguard and promote
the welfare of children, particularly in terms of being healthy, staying safe,
enjoying and achieving, making a positive contribution and achieving
economic well being.

Children’s Guardians are there to help achieve
the best possible outcomes for the children
they represent. In particular, they:

>
appoint a solicitor for the child who specialises
in working with children and families

>
advise the court about what work needs to
be done before the court makes its decisions

>
write a report for the court saying what they

think would be best for the child. The report

must tell the court about the wishes and

feelings of the child.

To do this, the Children’s Guardian spends
time getting to know the child and members
of their family. They talk to other people who
know the family, such as relatives, teachers,
social workers and health visitors. They attend
meetings on behalf of the child, check records
and read reports and statements. They may
also recommend to the court that other
professionals are asked to help, such as
a paediatrician or a psychologist.

11)   With my observations above, do you believe Cafcass order should be withdrawn? And a written apology to make a report “one sided” and even comments that are misleading personal opinions as the comment of the websites that withhold all the evidence of the harm to Sebastian by Samantha, this should be a serious concern and the basis should also be known if it was because of race, gender, religion, or race.
12)   Do you believe Cafcass made an unwise decision based on the evidence now been more carefully seen?
13)   Do you believe you should see the evidence first, make and exhaustive discovery before you are attempting to decide the whole life of a child, a life you will not suffer the consequences of your actions? And should have done before submitting your report?
14)   Do you realize that Cafcass one sided version document, FAILED TO PERFORM THEIR DUTIES not performing required findings, or interviews to the Members of the Family, not even to talk to the father having his emails, not even with access to the evidence of the harm to Sebastian and been kidnapped, ignore all such harm to Sebastian and make such a report to the court in such a way, is a serious violation to Sebastian and his family rights. Gross Negligence that has placed Sebastian, a two year old child under continued suffering, in serious personal injury already showing physical and psychological harm, but with such reckless report, placing the life of Sebastian in a permanent harm for not only his life, but all his family.
15)   Cafcass have place the Future of Sebastian at risk and violated his rights
16) Cafcass have placed him at serious risk of harm
17)   Did Cafcass know of the murder attempts of the Lowry Family in Mexico against Sebastian Grand parents?
18)   Did Cafcass know Samantha had burned 1200 of Daniel Paintings aided by her family, harming Sebastian future financial stability, his heritage his patrimony?
19)   Did Cafcass know Samantha entered Daniel email account and erased all his emails? Which I hereby request
20)   Did you know Samantha was physically violent to Daniel, and Daniel did not do anything?
21)   Did you know Samantha refused to the vaccines of Sebastian?
22)   Did you know Samantha had stolen the travel documents of Daniel and Sebastian and make impossible the return of Sebastian and Daniel to Austin, to their home?
Did you know Samantha broke through a window and moved in with 8 people to Daniel homestead, including unknown man, up to date?
Did you know of all the violence of the Lowry Family as the distraction for the fraud of 35 million dollars?
Did you know of such Law suit?
23)   I HEREBY REQUEST AN IMMEDIATE MEDIATION, AS FOLLOWS.
24)   SAMANTHA ME AND ONE INTERMEDIARY NEUTRAL AND WITH KNOWLEDGE OF LAW.
25)   A TELECONFERENCE CALL EXCLUSIVELY BETWEEN THE PARTIES FOR ONE HOUR ON A DAILY BASIS, THIS FOR 14 DAYS,
26)   THIS SHOULD BE DONE ON A DAILY BASIS FOR ONE HOUR. EXCLUDING SATURDAY AND SUNDAY (MEDIATOR SCHEDULE)
27)   I HEREBY SEND EVIDENCE TO CAFCASS, SAMANTHA ATTORNEYS AND SOLICITORS, AND ALSO MADE PUBLIC FOR OTHERS.
THE EVIDENCE CONTAIN WITHIN THE SITES
www.judgewrong.org , www.injusticeofjustice.net both sites contain the evidence of the harm to my son and family. Go to newsoftexas.info for very important information and how they made the false warrants by fraud and deception.
NOTICE:
YOU ARE HEREBY INFORMED THAT IT IS YOUR DUTY TO REPORT THE CRIMES YOU HAVE FOUND AND ARE HEREBY PROVEN IN REGARDS TO SAMANTHA LOWRY AND SUSAN LOWRY.
I DANIEL PAVON CUELLAR HEREBY MAKE YOU LIABLE FOR ANY INTERFERENCE AND/OR VIOLATIONS OF SEBASTIAN AND/OR HIS FAMILY RIGHTS, TO ANY LOSS TO HIS PATRIMONY, TO HIS FUTURE EDUCATION, TO HIS WELL BEING, TO ANY PERSONAL INJURY HE MAY SUFFER FOR ANY DELAY CAUSED BY YOUR PROCEEDINGS, FOR ANY LOSS OPPORTUNITIES, FOR ANY PERSONAL INJURY AND ANY OTHER HARM SEBASTIAN MAY SUFFER AS A RESULT OF YOUR REPORT
I HEREBY MAKE YOU LIABLE TO ANY HARM MY SON OR ANY MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY MAY SUFFER FROM YOUR PROCEEDINGS AND FINDINGS THAT ARE FALSE.
YOU ARE SUPPLIED WITH THE INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE ON THE WEBSITES ABOVE TO PROVE ALL THE PERJURIES OF SAMANTHA LOWRY AND SUSAN LOWRY BASED AND PROVEN WITH EVIDENCE, IN FACT THE SAME EVIDENCE SAMANTHA USED AGAINST DANIEL PROVES THE INNOCENCE OF DANIEL AND THE CRIMES AND FRAUD OF SAMANTHA AND HOW SHE USED HER OWN SON TO OBTAIN MILLIONS, CARELESS OF HER OWN SON
YOU WILL HAVE THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR PHYSICAL VIOLENCE, AND HOW THEY DESTROYED ME, MY SON AND MY FAMILY JUST FOR A HUGE THEFT, AND CARELESS OF THE HARM THEY DID TO SEBASTIAN.
YOUR WEBSITE EXPLAINS YOUR DUTIES, AND I HEREBY REQUEST YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION. MY SON IS AT HIGH RISK OF HARM. REMOVE IMMEDIATELY SUCH FINDING FROM THE RECORD AS BEEN INACCURATE.
I HEREBY PLACE MY OBJECTION TO THE FINDINGS.
THE STATEMENT OF SAMANTHA SHOWS THE HARM OF HER KIDNAPPING.
STOP THE HARM TO MY SON, RESPECT HIS RIGHTS, DEFEND HIS RIGHTS
DON T BE THE VOICE THAT WILL DESTROY HIS OWN FUTURE AND PRIVILEGES OF LIFE
THE 80 YEARS HE MAY LIVE ARE ABOUT TO START, PROTECT HIS LIFE, PROTECT HIS FUTURE, PROTECT HIS FAMILY, AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT.
SAMANTHA HAS TO COMPLY WITH THE AGREEMENT IMMEDIATELY AND WITHOUT DELAY. THAT WILL BE THE BEST PROTECTION TO SEBASTIAN IN ALL ASPECTS OF HIS LIFE, IT BRINGS IMMEDIATE RELIEF TO ALL, AND IT BALANCES JUSTICE AND GRANTS DUE PROCESS. THE CONTRACT STOPS THE HARM AGAINST SEBASTIAN IMMEDIATELY AND GIVES HIM A CHANCE TO RECOVER HIS PRIVILEGES OF LIFE HAS GRANTED HIM